MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2391346923

Game Analysis of the Policy of Returning Farmland to Lake

2007· article· en· W2391346923 on OpenAlexaff
Mao De

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHydropower, Displacement, Environmental Impact
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)ChinaInvestment (military)CommodityFlood mythDistribution (mathematics)GeographyAgricultural economicsBusinessPoliticsEconomicsPolitical scienceFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The method of game theory was applied to explore the game relation among all the parties involved in the course of returning farmland to lake and in immigrant resettlement which chose the Dongting Lake Region as an example.The Dongting Lake region locates at the south of Jing river,middle reaches of Yangtze River,the north of Hunan Province.It is a huge alluvial plain around the Dongting Lake,which total area is 18 780 km2,and 15 200 km2 in the Hunan Province accounting for 80.9% of total area,3 580 km2 in Hubei Province accounting for 19.1% of total area.It is the commodity grain base and industry material base in China and possesses important economical station,but the Dongting Lake Region is also affected by very frequent and serious flood-waterloggy disaster in China.The results showed that the profits of local governments and peasants must be considered in the project of returning farmland to lake and the work of immigrant resettlement,the action motive of each game party must be sought in terms of Economic Rational People,and appropriate policy must be established on the basis of game analysis.The returning farmland to lake engineering would not be brought to success only depending on the local government investment,the investment from the center government was necessary and served for a dominant function.But the most optimum distribution of resovces would not be achived only depending on the center government investment.The center government,or the superior government,should consider its ecological benefit of flood prevention and economic benefit of the local governments and the peasants in a comprehensive way.To develop local economic and enhance the enthusiasm of the local government admitting the immigrant through implementing are long and steady good policy,so the project of returning farmland to lake could be carried on in proper sequence.It is not only unreasonable to increase the probability that the local governments admit the immigrant through reducing the cost of immigrant resettlement,but also damaging the benefit of the immigrant.In order to enhance the enthusiasm of the local government admitting the immigrant,the superior governments should consider the benefit of local governments,carry out the favourable policy continuously and stably,and dismiss all doublts of the local government.Those are the ultimate way to solve the immigrant problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.413 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydropower, Displacement, Environmental ImpactFrench-language works237,207