MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2391622048

Study on Phenotypic Diversity of Fruits Character in Catalpa fargesii f.Duclouxii

2013· article· en· W2391622048 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Liu Zheng-ben

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicForest, Soil, and Plant Ecology in China
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUPGMABiologyPhenotypePhenotypic traitPopulationGenetic variationGeneticsDemographyGene
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The phenotypes variation of 9 populations of Catalpa fargesii f.duclouxii,8 traits were investigated and the phenotype diversities within and inter-popula-tions were analyzed by adopting the methods of nested analysis of variance,coefficient of variation,correlation analysis and cluster analysis.The results showed that fruit traits among populations had reached a very significant level(p0.01) differences within populations.The CV of phenotypic traits of the average was 31.03%,with a change in the range of 24.53% to 39.28%.Phenotypic differentiation coefficient between populations(10.91% to 36.34%) was 22.81%.The intra-population phenotypic differentiation(77.19%) was significantly higher than the inter-population's(22.81%).According to the UPGMA cluster analysis of the populations of C.fargesii f.duclouxii could be divided into three groups.These cluster results were not due to geographic distancesa and Phenotypic variation between groups showed discontinuous.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicForest, Soil, and Plant Ecology in ChinaFrench-language works237,207