MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2391778898

Multi-function micro-plasma spraying technology

2006· article· en· W2391778898 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Liuying Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the China Welding Institution · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh-Temperature Coating Behaviors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroplasmaMaterials sciencePlasmaThermal sprayingSpray nozzleGas dynamic cold sprayNozzleSolution precursor plasma sprayIndentation hardnessComposite materialNanotechnologyMechanical engineeringCoatingMicrostructureEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

According to aerodynamics,plasma spray theory and the idea of expert in one thing and good at many ,multi-functional microplasma spraying systems were developed.The IGBT inversion technology,micro-computer control engineering,soft switch technology,Laval nozzle structure and center axial powder feed were adopted in the designs of micro-plasma spraying systems,which made it possess the characteristics of small volume,light weight,strong anti-jamming,accurate control,high velocity of spray particles,high deposit efficiency of powder and high reliability etc.The system can produce different kinds of high quality coatings.The experimental results show that the bonding strength and microhardness of nano-structured Al_2O_3+13%TiO_2 coatings produced by multi-functional micro-plasma spraying are better than those of the same coatings produced by 9M plasma spraying.As the result,the coatings whose properties are equavitent of those of the coatings produced by conventional plasma spraying can also be deposited by multi-functional micro-plasma spraying with lower power by means of improving power design,spray gun structure and powder feed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.352
Threshold uncertainty score0.567

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the China Welding InstitutionSame topicHigh-Temperature Coating BehaviorsFrench-language works237,207