Identification of a Cotesia species parasitizing on Pieris rapae from Beijing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A biological control programme against Pieris rapae L.(Lepidoptera,Pieridae) in China made release of Cotesia rubecula(Marshall) imported from Canada in 1979 1980.A native species Cotesia sp.which is solitary endoparasitoids of Pieris rapae in Beijing has been misidentify to C.rubecula by Hu et al.since 1981.We further examined specimens of Cotesia sp.and C.rubecula.We recognize that C.rubecula and Cotesia sp.are difference species,and the both species are very similar.But there is a large discrepancy in the structure of stigma of fore wing,submarginal cell of hind wing,the morphological characters of digitus(form,teeth numbers) and parameral plate(form) of male genitalia.In this paper the specimens which were collected from Beijing were identified as Cotesia sp.(nr.rubecula Marshall) by authors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".