MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2391800167

The 3D Reconstruction of Recovering Surface Texture from Free Multiple Views

2009· article· en· W2391800167 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhihua Dong

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocomputer applications · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Processing and 3D Reconstruction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSilhouetteComputer visionTexture mappingArtificial intelligenceProjection (relational algebra)Perspective (graphical)Texture (cosmology)3D reconstructionProjective texture mappingDisplacement mappingSurface (topology)Computer graphics (images)Image (mathematics)Image textureAlgorithmImage processingMathematicsGeometry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An automatic method of mapping the texture from multiple calibrated camera views onto a 3D model which is estimated using a shape-from-silhouette approach is presented in this paper.It solves the problems in the previous method of the registration between 2D images and 3D geometry model by designing a novel registration pattern and making use of texture mapping method based on perspective projection,and achieves the goal of automatic,high accuracy and fast.The experiments have confirmed the suitability of this proposed method,and the result is acceptable and satisfactory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrocomputer applicationsSame topicImage Processing and 3D ReconstructionFrench-language works237,207