MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2391891157

The Twenty Years of the Theory and Practice in Educational Inspection in China: An Exploration

2001· article· en· W2391891157 on OpenAlexaff
Jun Tang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Northwest Normal University · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEvaluation Methods in Various Fields
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaWork (physics)Field (mathematics)Component (thermodynamics)Engineering ethicsSociologyPolitical sciencePedagogyLawEngineeringMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The educational inspection is an important component part of China's education, serving as a significant measure to administer education by law, to strengthen the construction of the legal system, and to manage education in a scientifie way. An exploration into these twenty years' practisings in this field reveals that there has been a great advancement made both in theory and in practice in respect to educational inspection, but there is still something to be desired. Therefore, it is necessary for us to look back and sum up the past experiences and lessons, so as to turn them into useful resources which we will make the best use of in bettering the future work of educational inspection and have it play its positive role in developing education as a whole in China.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Northwest Normal UniversitySame topicEvaluation Methods in Various FieldsFrench-language works237,207