MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2392350442

Progress in research on the marine microbial loop in the Arctic Ocean

2011· article· en· W2392350442 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ling Lin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrobial loopArcticSea iceEcosystemOceanographyEnvironmental scienceMarine ecosystemPhytoplanktonProchlorococcusMicrobial population biologyEcologyArctic ecologyBiologyFood webSynechococcusGeologyNutrientBacteriaCyanobacteria
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The microbial loop plays an important role in the marine ecosystem.Studies of the microbial loop in the Arctic Ocean are limited because of sea ice coverage.Investigations have shown that the role of the microbial loop in the arctic marine ecosystem varies depending on season and region.Rapid changes in the environment,especially the decrease in sea ice coverage in summer,have been found to lead to changes in the microbial loop structure.Some studies,showing an increase of bacterial abundance and a shift in phytoplankton size structure towards small microbial eukaryotes,suggest a potential enhancement of the role of the microbial loop in the Arctic Ocean.The study of the microbial loop is an important research component,essential to the understanding of the structure and function of the Arctic Ocean ecosystem. Results show that,for example,the structure of the arctic microbial loop is simple compared to those in low latitude areas.Bacterial production is controlled by protozoan grazing in winter,but regulated by DOM concentrations in spring and there is divergence in the ecological role of viruses in the microbial loop.However,to date most studies focus on the shelf waters of the Canadian Arctic,Chukchi Sea,Beaufort Sea and Barents Sea,few examine the central Arctic Ocean.Little research has investigated seasonal variation in the microbial loop in the basins due to logistical limitations.Apart from prochlorococcus,almost all assemblages found in the marine microbial loop occur in the Arctic Ocean.Prokaryotes are rarely reported except for bacteria. Based on these prior studies and on the environmental changes occurring in the Arctic Ocean,the following questions should be addressed in the near future: 1) What are the consequences of the grazing of protozoa on phytoplankton and bacteria? Why does the importance of the microbial loop vary and what is the main course of these variations? Are community structure,biomass,environmental factors and / or the recent environmental changes the main factors underlying these variations;2) What is the importance of the different assemblages in the microbial loop,such as the viruses and Achaea,which are abundant in Arctic waters but for which few data are available;3) What are the seasonal and inter-annual variations in microbial loop processes? How do microbes of Arctic microbial loop respond and adapt to environmental change,especially to sea-ice change?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena→French-language works237,207→