Mental Health State and Alexithymia in Impoverished Undergraduates of Financial Colleges
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the Mental Health State of the impoverished undergraduates of financial colleges and to explore the relationship between psychological state and personality alexithymia thus providing basis for solving the psychological problems of impoverished undergraduates better.Methods: A sample of 298 impoverished undergraduates were tested with Symptom Checklist-90(SCL-90) and the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale(TAS-20).And the result was compared with that of non-impoverished undergraduates.Results: 1.The factorial scores of depression,phobic anxiety,interpersonal sensitivity,psychoticism,paranoid ideation and the total score of SCL-90 of the impoverished undergraduates were higher than those of the control group.2.All factorial scores and the total score of SCL-90 of the alexithymia team were significantly higher than those of non-alexithymia team.3.The F1 factor and the number of undergraduates with alexithymia in the impoverished group were both higher than those of the control group.4.The factorial scores and the total score of TAS-20 were significantly related to those of SCL-90(P0.01 or P0.05).Conclusions: 1.Compared with non-impoverished undergraduates,impoverished undergraduates have more psychosomatic symptoms,mainly expressed in depression,phobic anxiety,interpersonal sensitivity,psychoticism,paranoid ideation.2.Alexithymia and Mental Health State are correlated.Those with alexithymia are more likely to have psychosomatic symptoms.3.F1(difficulty in identifying emotions) is the more sensitive factor to identify alexithymia symptoms compared with other factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".