MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2392418306 · doi:10.1090/proc/13477

Commutants of weighted shift directed graph operator algebras

2016· article· en· W2392418306 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the American Mathematical Society · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicHolomorphic and Operator Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaLondon Mathematical Society
KeywordsCentralizer and normalizerProperty (philosophy)Countable setDirected graphOperator (biology)GraphVertex (graph theory)Weight function

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider non-selfadjoint operator algebras <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="script upper L left-parenthesis upper G comma lamda right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-caligraphic" mathvariant="script">L</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathcal {L} (G,\lambda )</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> generated by weighted creation operators on the Fock-Hilbert spaces of countable directed graphs <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">G</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>. These algebras may be viewed as non-commutative generalizations of weighted Bergman space algebras or as weighted versions of the free semigroupoid algebras of directed graphs. A complete description of the commutant is obtained together with broad conditions that ensure the double commutant property. It is also shown that the double commutant property may fail for <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="German upper L left-parenthesis upper G comma lamda right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="fraktur">L</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathfrak {L} (G,\lambda )</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> in the case of the single vertex graph with two edges and a suitable choice of left weight function <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="lamda"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\lambda</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.648

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicHolomorphic and Operator TheoryFrench-language works237,207