MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2392459981

A JPEG Steganalysis Algorithm based on Kernel Fisher Discriminant

2005· article· en· W2392459981 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Huang Jifeng

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocomputer applications · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSteganalysisSteganographyJPEGComputer scienceFisher kernelKernel Fisher discriminant analysisPattern recognition (psychology)Kernel (algebra)Linear discriminant analysisDiscrete cosine transformArtificial intelligenceHistogramImage (mathematics)Feature vectorFeature (linguistics)Information hidingKernel methodAlgorithmSupport vector machineMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of image steganalysis is to find out whether the hidden messages exist in images. After differencing DCT coefficients of natural-images and stego-images, their histograms present different laws. This paper regards this as the feature vector to determine whether a hiding message is in the image. Then we further analyse JPEG image which hides the low amount of information, and find that using Kernel fisher discriminant with linear kernel function has good capability of classifying. The results of the experiments show our approach is effective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.847

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrocomputer applicationsSame topicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesFrench-language works237,207