A Comparative Study of Seed Protein Content and Seed Flavonoid Content between Diploid and Tetraploid Tartary Buckwheat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The seed protein content and seed flavonoid content between 9 diploid tartary buckwheat accessions and their tetraploid lines were studied comparatively by means of kjeldahl determination and spectrophotometry.The results showed that tetraploid tartary buckwheat had the average protein content of 17.21% with the range of 15.1%-19.4%,significantly higher than their diploid parents 13.97% with the range of 12.9%-15.9%.Meanwhile,the tetraploid tartary buckwheat had the average flavonoid content of 3.64% with the range of 3.12%-4.57%,also significantly higher than their diploid parents(2.77%) with the range of 2.42%-2.98%.The correlation analysis showed that there was no siginificant relationship of flavonoid content and protein content between diploid and tetraploid tartary buckwheat.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".