MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2392584561

A Comparative Study of Seed Protein Content and Seed Flavonoid Content between Diploid and Tetraploid Tartary Buckwheat

2013· article· en· W2392584561 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSeed and Plant Biochemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlavonoidPloidyKjeldahl methodBotanyFood scienceBiologyChemistryHorticultureBiochemistryNitrogen
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The seed protein content and seed flavonoid content between 9 diploid tartary buckwheat accessions and their tetraploid lines were studied comparatively by means of kjeldahl determination and spectrophotometry.The results showed that tetraploid tartary buckwheat had the average protein content of 17.21% with the range of 15.1%-19.4%,significantly higher than their diploid parents 13.97% with the range of 12.9%-15.9%.Meanwhile,the tetraploid tartary buckwheat had the average flavonoid content of 3.64% with the range of 3.12%-4.57%,also significantly higher than their diploid parents(2.77%) with the range of 2.42%-2.98%.The correlation analysis showed that there was no siginificant relationship of flavonoid content and protein content between diploid and tetraploid tartary buckwheat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.640
Threshold uncertainty score0.615

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it