MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2393230411

Allelopathy Effect of Decomposed Liquids of Cotton Stalk Under Different Decomposing Modes on Cotton Seeds Germination

2011· article· en· W2393230411 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lili Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAllelopathy and phytotoxic interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerminationRadicleAllelopathyStalkDecompositionAgronomyDry weightHorticultureBiologyChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cotton long-term continuously cropping and cotton stalk returning to field are general in Xinjiang,China.Two modes were designed in this research:natural decomposition and microbial inoculation methods to decompose cotton stalk,and allelopathy of the decomposed liquids on cotton seeds germination was studied.The results showed that natural decomposed liquids showed strong autotoxity on cotton seeds germination,as concentration of the decomposed liquids reached 5g/L,seeds germination rate and germination index started to decrease significantly(p0.05).While the growth vigor of germinated seeds were affected less,the germinated seeds could even bear the decomposed liquids concentration up to 30g/L.In artificial decomposition,the autotoxity of decomposed liquids was eliminated to a large extent,the decomposed liquids still showed no significant inhibiting effects on seeds germination rate achieved the concentration of 50g/L even,on the contrary,the vigor index and radicle dry weight of the germinated seeds increased very significantly(p0.01).The different results of seeds germination in two decomposition mode indicated that the seeds germination energy,germination rate,germination index and vigor index in artificial decomposition were heightened very significantly(p0.01),and the radicle dry weight increased significantly(p0.05).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.417
Threshold uncertainty score0.274

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicAllelopathy and phytotoxic interactionsFrench-language works237,207