Comparative studies on the performance of Taihu pig double cross combinations and that of Duroc×(Landrace×Large Yorkshire) three-way cross combinations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The performances of the double cross combinations [(L×Y)×(P×T),(L×Y)×(D×T),(P×D)×(Y×T)],which were formed from Taihu pig as dam line,the new Duroc of USA,anti-stress Pietrain of Germany,double muscle Large Yorkshire of Canada and the new Landrace of Danmark as sire lines,were studied and compared with that of three-way crossing combination D×(L×Y).Except for growth capability,reproduction performance and meat quality of the Taihu double cross combinations were superior to that of D×(L×Y) combination,especially in(L×Y)×(D×T) combination which is a more ideal combination with the higher litter size(14.51), survival litter size(13.86) and lower water loss(6.58%) compared with D×(L×Y) combination(P0.01 or P0.05),and medium muscular fat(3.32%).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".