MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2393298911

Using electron probe X-ray microanalysis to study calcium release from atrial specific granules induced by injection of adrenaline in rats

2002· article· en· W2393298911 on OpenAlexaff
Hong Gao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor materials and devices
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectron probe microanalysisMicroanalysisChemistryCalciumStimulationPhosphotungstic acidSecretionInternal medicineAnalytical Chemistry (journal)EndocrinologyChromatographyMedicineBiochemistryMineralogyElectron microprobe
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Whether the release of Ca from atrial specific granules (ASG) can promote ASG secretion was studied. The ultrathin cryosections and ethanolic phosphotungstic acid staining sections of rat atrial cardiocytes were prepared. Quantitative electron probe X ray microanalysis of Hall continuum method was adopted to measure the alteration of Ca content in ASG at the exact time intervals of 15, 30, 60, 120 min after the adrenaline (Ad) administration. The numerical density (N v ) was measured to estimate the ASG secretion. It was observed that the N v of ASG gradually decreased and reached the lowest value at the time of 60 min after the Ad administration. Meanwhile, the Ca content of ASG gradually decreased and reached the lowest value at the time of 30 min after the Ad administration. It showed that the decrease in Ca content took place earlier than that of ASG number. Accordingly, it suggested that the Ca released from ASG due to Ad stimulation might become a messenger triggering atrial natriuretic peptide secretion. The quantitative electron probe X ray microananlysis of Hall continuum method was discussed in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.670

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSemiconductor materials and devicesFrench-language works237,207