MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2393319714

Construction of Three-dimensional Teaching Model for Organic Chemistry Experiment

2010· article· en· W2393319714 on OpenAlex
Wang Li

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEducation and Teaching Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHigher Education and Teaching Methods
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics educationTeaching philosophyClass (philosophy)Process (computing)Chemistry educationDimension (graph theory)Teaching methodChemistryComputer scienceEngineeringPsychologyArtificial intelligenceMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the teaching characteristics of applied Chemistry in Agricultural university,following the student-centered,teacher-led teaching philosophy,by constructing three-dimensional teaching model of Experimental Organic Chemistry,three-dimension of preview before class,experimental process and performance appraisal has been achieved,which has enabled students to shift passive learning to active exploring.With combination of experimental teaching from classroom and learning from network,knowledge achieving and skills improvement have been realized.All of these can effectively develop students' analytical abilities and creative abilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.720
Threshold uncertainty score0.516

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it