Evaluation of China shale gas from the exploration and development of North America shale gas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
America is the first country for the commercial shale gas exploration and development in the world.The shale gas yield of America is close to 900×108 m3 in 2009.The high-speed exploration and development of shale gas makes the natural gas reserves of America increase by 40%.Canada is the second country for the commercial shale gas exploration and development in the world,and the exploration and development is mainly in Horn River Basin and Triassic Montney shale,the northeastern British Columbia.In recent years,the exploration and development is also in other provinces.According to the shale gas exploration and development characteristics and successful experience of North America and the geologic characteristics of shale gas forming of China,the revelation for the shale gas exploration and development of China is as follows:(1)shale gas is a kind of great potential resource,it can be explored and developed in the near feature and good economic benefit can be obtained,and therefore it should be paid attention in oil and gas development decision;(2)shale gas reservoir is a widely distributed,easily found,low abundant,difficultly recovered unconventional self-generation self-storage gas reservoir,its exploration and development requires advanced techniques,strict cost control,favorable tax policy and environmental protection policy;(3)the geological background of shale gas forming in China is more complicated than that in North America,and therefore the evaluation of shale gas blocks should establish the standard suitable to the geological conditions of shale gas forming in China.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".