Study on Inhibition Effect of Zinc on Seed Germination and Root Elongation of Hibiscus hamabo Sieb.et Zucc.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is important to study the inhibition effect of Zinc on seed germination and root elongation of H.hamabo Sieb for planting H.hamabo Sieb.on the heavily pollution of coast and phytoremediation to heavy metal pollution Soil.The changes of seed germination rate,germinating energy,root elongation and total biomass of H.hamabo Sieb were determined in different concentration of Zinc.The results showed that Zn2+ of lower concentration could promote the seed germination of H.hamabo Sieb.but it was insensitive to the Zn2+concentration rised,and showed inhibitional effect at the Zn2+concentration increased 400mg/g.Inhibition effect of Zinc on seed germination rate was much less compared with that of the root elongation and total biomass.With the increasing of Zn2+ concentration,the root elongation and biomass obviously decreased.There was a positive relation between the inhibitory rate on root elongation and Zn2+of concentration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".