MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2393582145 · doi:10.1002/dac.3146

The offloading model for green base stations in hybrid energy networks with multiple objectives

2016· article· en· W2393582145 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Communication Systems · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceBase stationBase (topology)Computer networkEnergy consumptionDistributed computingTelecommunicationsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Based on green energy prediction and storage, a novel green base station (GBS) offloading model is proposed and can be employed with multiple objectives in this paper to save energy. By predicting the value of green energy collected by GBS and updating the residual energy of each GBS, we can obtain the maximum number of users that each GBS can offload theoretically. Then, the optimum number of users should be calculated in order to achieve different network performance. Eventually, under the restrictions of the maximum number of users and the optimum number of users, we can finish offloading for traditional base station in the network. Simulation results demonstrate that through the proposed GBS offloading model, we can fulfill compromise between maximizing green energy utilization and load balancing in the offloading process, and the effect of energy saving is remarkable. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.258

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it