Preliminary Report on Experiment Effect of Seedlings by Sowing of Pinus banksiana and Supplement Lighting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The experiment of supplement lighting at night was conducted on seven planting seedlings of Pinus banksiana provenance from Canadian using sun light lamp(B2),dysprosium fluorescent lamp(B3) and iodine tung-sten lamp(B4).The results showed that: the sun light lamp(B2) had best effect for the promotion of seedling growth,average height and basal diameter of seven provenance were greater than that of 109 percent and 65 per-cent re-spectively,dysprosium fluorescent lamp(B3) had good effect,average height and basal diameter were more than 74% and 45%,iodine tungsten lamp(B4) had bad effect,height and basal diameter were greater than that of con-trol respectively 52 percent and 34 percent.Under the conditions of using the same supplement lighting and vari-ous management measures,growth increment of A2 and A3 had obvious advantages,the height of 2-year-old seedling of Pinus banksiana reached 23.15 cm and 24.24 cm respectively;and basal diameter reached 0.39 cm and 0.50 cm respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".