MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2393874894

Settlement Calculation of Rigid Piled-structure Embankment in High-speed Railway

2013· article· en· W2393874894 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Tongji University · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCivil and Geotechnical Engineering Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeveeSettlement (finance)Geotechnical engineeringFoundation (evidence)Structural engineeringStress (linguistics)GeologyEngineeringComputer scienceGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Mindlin-Boussinesq uniting solution is used to calculate the additional stress,and the settlement is calculated with the method of e-lgp curve.And then,the calculation results are analyzed comprehensively by comparing with the existing calculation methods and the in-situ measurement data.The research results show that the limitation exists in the settlement calculation of rigid piled-structure embankment under embankment loads and over-consolidated or strong structural soil by the method of existing code.The Mindlin-Boussinesq uniting solution is used to calculate the additional stress of soil between piles in rigid piled-structure embankment.The distribution along depth can accord with the actual engineering situation;and the settlement calculated by method of e-lgp curve is relatively close to in-situ measurement data,which can take the parameters of the rigid piled-structure embankment and stress history of foundation soil into consideration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.832
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it