Bibliographic record
Abstract
C×S(Canadian-Yorkshire×Shaziling) 2-way cross sows were mated with Shaziling boar.16 piglets which were experimental groups divided into two groups(F2 white group and F2 color group,8 heads pergroup) were chosen from F2,meanwhile 8 Shaziling piglets were chosen as control group.Experimental pigs of three groups were fed the same diet of energy and protein level.The trial lasted for 147 days.The results showed the daily gain(580.36g),feed/meat(3.96),lean meat rate(45.64%) of F2 white group were as similar as the F2 color group,and the above indexes of both groups were higher than that of the Shaziling group(510.63g,4.20,40.86%).Compared with orthogonal C×S,the daily gain of the F2 backcross pigs was as similar as orthogonal pigs,and feed/meat 8.17% higher,and lean meat rate 8.66% lower.The experiment indicated that backcross was not suitable in the swine production.The backcross will bring about hair color segregation and is harmful for conserration of local pig breed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".