MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2393973174

On Self-organization Mechanism of Curriculum Development

2007· article· en· W2393973174 on OpenAlexaff
Xinhai Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Northwest Normal University · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCognitive Science and Education Research
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumOpenness to experienceMechanism (biology)CausationCompetition (biology)Curriculum theoryProcess (computing)Emergent curriculumSelf-organizationCurriculum developmentMathematics educationPsychologyCurriculum mappingComputer sciencePedagogyPolitical scienceSocial psychologyEpistemologyArtificial intelligenceEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Curriculum can be regarded as the self-organization system with its own developmental pattern.As for the main components of this pattern,it includes the following factors: openness and nonequilibrium state are the prior condition;fluctuation is the original causation;competition and synergetic effects are the driving force;gradual change and violent change are the developmental approach;innovation is the starting point and the destination of the curriculum development.Therefore,to ensure the favorable progress of curriculum,we should consciously follow and utilize the self-organization regulation,create the condition,hold the opportunity,and establish the right direction in the process of curriculum development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Northwest Normal UniversitySame topicCognitive Science and Education ResearchFrench-language works237,207