Dominant nationalism, dominant ethnicity : identity, federalism and democracy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contents: Andre Lecours/Genevieve Nootens: Introduction: Nationalism and Identity in Contemporary Politics. Issues of Democratic Shared and Self-rule - Eric Kaufmann: Dominant Ethnicity and Dominant Nationhood. Empirical and Normative Aspects - Daniele Conversi: Dominant Ethnicities, Dominant Cultures and Cultural Resemblance. State-building, Boundaries, Assimilation and Violence - Jan Erk: Red, White and Orange. Dominant Nationalism in France and the Netherlands Compared - Stephen Tierney: Crystallizing Dominance. Majority Nationalism, Constitutionalism and the Courts - Alain-G. Gagnon/Raffaele Iacovino: Challenging the Constraints of State Nationalism in Canada - Daniel Beland/Andre Lecours: Nationalism, Federalism, and Social Citizenship. The Continental Divide Reconsidered - Jacques Bertrand: The Limits of State Nationalism in Indonesia - Michael Burgess: From Dominance to Partnership. The Inheritance of Majority Nations in Multinational Federations - James Tully: Federations, Communities and their Transformations. An Essay in Revision.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".