MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2394220557

Varietal Identification of Oat(Avena spp.)by Ultrathin-layer Isoelectric Focusing of Seed Protein

2007· article· en· W2394220557 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Minxuan Liu, Qingping Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Agrestia Sinica · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAvenaIsoelectric pointIsoelectric focusingBiologyBotanyHorticultureAgronomy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seed prolamine variation among sixteen oat(Avena spp.)seed samples,consisting of nine varieties and four samples of unknown names cultivated in Qinghai Province,and three varieties cultivated in Hebei Province,was analyzed using ultrathin-layer isoelectric focusing electrophoresis(UTLIEF).The results show that among the tested varieties,a total of 34 bands were identified.Based on distinctive bands at PI point of 4.8,6.55,6.9,7.7,8.4,and 8.6,respectively.Thirteen of the 16 tested samples differentiated from each other.In the present paper,the whole seed,1/2 seed units and 1/4 seed units of Qingyongjiu No.473,Canadian oat,Bayou No.5,and U4,as well as the seeds of Canada oat after aging treatment were electrophoresed by UTLIEF.The results prove that seed variability and damaged seeds of half of their original size,or even dead seeds did not affect the electrophoresis results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.837

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Agrestia SinicaSame topicSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesFrench-language works237,207