MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2394241195

A blind channel estimation method based on the code structure of LDPC codes

2009· article· en· W2394241195 on OpenAlexaff
Hu Qian -

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicError Correcting Code Techniques
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLow-density parity-check codeComputer scienceAlgorithmAdditive white Gaussian noiseDecoding methodsChannel (broadcasting)Phase-shift keyingConcatenated error correction codeBit error rateTelecommunicationsBlock code
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The noise variance of the channel is necessary in the iterative soft decoding algorithm of LDPC.In this paper, by analyzing the blind channel estimation algorithm based on binary LDPC codes with BPSK modulation, we propose a channel noise variance estimation algorithm that utilizes the characteristics of the QPSK modulation and the structure of nonbinary LDPC in the AWGN channel.The novel estimation method is a fast channel estimation algorithm.We use the estimation result into decoding algorithm of nonbinary LDPC codes.The simulations show that this algorithm can get a better SNR without extra bandwidth and transmission power.This channel estimation can improve the LDPC decoding performance and the channel efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.643
Threshold uncertainty score0.292

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicError Correcting Code TechniquesFrench-language works237,207