Effect of 3R Therapy on Quality of Life and Subjective Well-being in Older Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment in Ningbo Communities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To observe the effect of 3R therapy on quality of life and subjective well-being in older patients with mild cognitive impairment(MCI). Methods 158 patients with MCI were collected from 8 communities in Ningbo city with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders(DSM)-IV as the diagnostic criteria, and assessed by Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA). The experimental group(n=79) was intervened by 3R(Reminiscence, Reality Orientation, Remotivation) for 12 weeks, and the control group(n=79) received no intervention. Their quality of life was assessed with WHO Quality of Life-BREF(WHOQOL-BREF) and the subjective well-being was assessed with Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale(PGC). Results Their quality of life and subjective well-being improved after intervention in the experimental group(P0.05), and were better in the experimental group than in the control group(P0.05). Conclusion 3R therapy could effectively improve the quality of life and subjective well-being in patients with MCI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".