MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2394313860

Optimization of Conditions for Petroleum-degrading Bacteria CQ6 Producing Biosurfactant

2015· article· en· W2394313860 on OpenAlexaff
FU Rui-mi

Bibliographic record

VenueHubei nongye kexue · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiofuel production and bioconversion
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResponse surface methodologyPetroleumPulmonary surfactantFermentationCentral composite designSurface tensionMicrobial enhanced oil recoveryCarbon sourceBacteriaDegradation (telecommunications)Strain (injury)ChemistryPulp and paper industryEnvironmental scienceChromatographyFood scienceBiologyMicroorganismComputer scienceBiochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to determine the surfactant-producing situation of petroleum-degradation bacteria in Changqing oil field,degradation rate of petroleum and surface tension of fermentation broth were studied when stain CQ-6 used crude oil as the carbon source, and the fermentation condition was optimized. Based on the single factor experiment, the temperature, the rotate speed and initial amount of oil as factors, the prediction model of quadratic regression polynomial equation on surfactantproducing was simulated with Box-Benhnken central composite principle and response surface methodology. The result showed that,the optimum condition of biosurfactant producing by strain CQ6 was as follows : the temperature was 25 ℃,the rotate speed was 190 r / min and the initial amount of oil was 3.4%.Under this condition, the degradation rate of petroleum increased from 64.4% to 80.2% and the surface tension of fermentation broth decreased from 32.5 m N / m to 27.0 m N / m compared with before optimization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHubei nongye kexueSame topicBiofuel production and bioconversionFrench-language works237,207