MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2394405580

Periodic Relationship between Inventory Adjustment and Output Volatility:Research Based on the Data of Listed Manufacturing Companies

2014· article· en· W2394405580 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
LV Feng-yon

Bibliographic record

VenueJingji wenti · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicForecasting Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVolatility (finance)Inventory investmentQuarter (Canadian coin)RevenueEconometricsEconomicsInvestment (military)BusinessMonetary economicsFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Firm inventory adjustment behavior will cause fluctuations in the economy of a country,especially in the short- term economic fluctuations. This paper takes listed manufacturing companies as samples and breaks inventory and other variables down into trend items and periodic items by H- P filter. Thereafter,volatility,correlation and periodicity of those periodic items are carefully studied,and some conclusions come to us: there is a significant positive correlation between inventory investment and operation revenue,but a significant negative correlation in the short term between inventory ratio and operation revenue growth rate on a quarter- on- quarter basis. As a necessary complement,spectral analysis is also carried out; the results show that periodic items of inventory investment,operation revenue and inventory ratio all have a primary cycle with a length of about nine quarters. Finally, the relationship of variable changes in each quarter since 2008 are described and analyzed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.610
GPT teacher head0.470
Teacher spread0.140 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJingji wentiSame topicForecasting Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207