MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2394448219

Study on the Key Factors and Countermeasures of Eco-Reconstruction in Lake Wuli

2004· article· en· W2394448219 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Changes in China
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceAquatic ecosystemVegetation (pathology)Water qualityHabitatEnvironmental resource managementRestoration ecologyEcosystemPollutionKey (lock)Environmental planningWater resource managementEnvironmental protectionEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The general situation,the main eco-environmental problems,the survey of present eco-environmental situation and ecological changes process of Lake Wuli were briefly introduced.The key factors of eco-reconstruction were analyzed from the conditions of hydrology,water quality and sediment.The corresponding eco-reconstruction countermeasures were put forward with consideration of the plans of new urban area and the new bank of Lake Wuli.The countermeasures included pollution sources control,habitat rehabilitation to create the conditions for ecological restoration,optimum design for artificial restoration of aquatic vegetation and aquatic ecosystem management.At the same time the mode and the way of ecosystem management were studied from the view of creating a new system and mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnvironmental Changes in ChinaFrench-language works237,207