La perception de la collaboration école-famille des parents d’élèves en situation de victimisation au primaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude vise à connaître la perception qu’ont les parents de la collaboration école-famille principalement lorsque leur enfant est victime de violence à l’école primaire. L’échantillon est constitué de 4394 parents qui ont rempli le Questionnaire sur la Sécurité et la Violence à l’École QSVE/parents. Les résultats rapportent que la collaboration école-famille est perçue positivement par les parents. Les parents qui croient leur enfant victime de violence montrent une perception plus négative de cette collaboration. Près d’un parent sur cinq a signalé à l’école la victimisation de son enfant. Parmi ceux l’ayant signalé entre une et trois fois, une grande proportion se dit satisfaite de l’accueil et de l’aide reçus de l’école, mais ils sont plus nombreux à se dire insatisfaits lorsque ces signalements ont été faits plus de quatre fois. La perception de cette collaboration devient moins positive en fonction du nombre de fois que le parent a signalé la victimisation à l’école.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".