Study on the Preparation of Mesophase Pitch from Modified Naphthenic Vacuum Residue by Direct Thermal Treatment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two feedstocks (LPA and HPA) obtained from modification of naphthenic vacuum residues were selected to prepare mesophase pitch by direct thermal treatment. The influence of reaction temperature, soaking time, reaction pressure, and molecular structures of the feedstock on mesophase development was systematically investigated by analyzing variations in carbonization yield, carbon residue, quinoline insolubles (QI) content, density, optical textures, crystal structure, and surface morphology of derived products. It is found that the mesophase development and the properties of resultant mesophase products were closely related to the molecular structure of the original materials and preparation conditions. Compared with LPA, HPA was the preferable feedstock for thermal treatment because of its high degree of aromaticity and a large proportion of naphthenic carbon, and the resultant product obtained under the optimum conditions showed large flow domain mesophase, fewer alkyl side chains, and a high degree of molecular orientation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it