MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2395151315

Towards a context-aware mobile app management framework

2015· article· en· W2395151315 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Science and Software Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGreen IT and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScrollingMobile appsComputer scienceContext (archaeology)World Wide WebVendorSmartphone appApp storeRecommender systemMobile deviceMultimedia
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In an app-driven society, the number of apps installed on smartphones will inevitably increase over time. As a result, navigating to locate apps, requires scrolling back and forth between various pages. Also, finding apps in the app store is complex due to the vast amount of choices. There is a need for mobile application management. Our proposed app management approach will mine contextual data from the user, information about apps installed, app usage, location, and time. The data collected will be used to organize relevant location based apps dynamically in a Context-Aware App widget. Our framework, consists of a two tier app-recommender component, which provides users with additional apps that may be needed but are not installed. A coarse-grained app recommender filters nearby vendor services with apps not installed whereas the fine-grained app recommender, filters apps based on users' preferences in their Personal Context Sphere (PCS).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.767
Threshold uncertainty score0.694

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it