MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2395273783

Analysis on correlation of white matter lesion and lacunar infarction with vascular cognitive impairment.

2015· article· en· W2395273783 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ting Yan, Jiarui Yu, Yunpei Zhang, Tao Li

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCognitive impairmentMontreal Cognitive AssessmentCardiologyInternal medicineHyperintensityDementiaCorrelationVascular dementiaWhite matterLesionCognitionLacunar infarctionFrontal lobeCerebral infarctionAudiologyPathologyIschemiaRadiologyPsychiatryMagnetic resonance imagingDisease
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the correlation of white matter lesion (WML) and lacunar infarction (LI) with vascular cognitive impairment. To investigate the correlation of cognitive changes of vascular dementia (VD) patients with lacunar infarction (LI) and white matter lesion (WML). METHODS: The clinical data of 60 cases of VD patients were evaluated and analyzed by combining with imageological findings and cognitive function assessment. RESULTS: Multiple LI and WML were negatively correlated with both mini-mental state examination (MMSE) scale scores (r = -0.401, P = 0.036) and clock drawing test (CDT) scale scores (r = -0.482, P = 0.028); the LI number in occipital lobe was negatively correlated with MMSE scores (r = 0.338, P = 0.048), the LI number in temporal lobe was negatively correlated with CDT scores (r = -0.235, P = 0.047), and the LI number in frontal lobe was negatively correlated with MoCA scores (r = -0.450, P = 0.039). CONCLUSION: All of LI location and number as well as WML are independent influencing factors of cognitive impairment of VD patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicNeurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207