Iterative Reweighted <formula formulatype="inline"><tex Notation="TeX">$\ell_{2}/\ell_{1}$</tex> </formula> Recovery Algorithms for Compressed Sensing of Block Sparse Signals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In many applications of compressed sensing the signal is block sparse, i.e., the non-zero elements of the sparse signal are clustered in blocks. Here, we propose a family of iterative algorithms for the recovery of block sparse signals. These algorithms, referred to as iterative reweighted ℓ2/ℓ1minimization algorithms (IR-ℓ2/ℓ1), solve a weighted ℓ2/ℓ1minimization in each iteration. Our simulation and analytical results on the recovery of both ideally and approximately block sparse signals show that the proposed iterative algorithms have significant advantages in terms of accuracy and the number of required measurements over non-iterative approaches as well as existing iterative methods. In particular, we demonstrate that, by increasing the block length, the performance of the proposed algorithms approaches the Wu-Verdú theoretical limit. The improvement in performance comes at a rather small cost in complexity increase. Further improvement in performance is achieved by using a priori information about the location of non-zero blocks, even if such a priori information is not perfectly reliable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.050 | 0.036 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".