MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2395403633

[Depression in schizophrenia: diagnosis, epidemiology, predisposing factors].

2010· article· el· W2395403633 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S.S. Stamouli

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2010
Typearticle
Languageel
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)PsychologyDepression (economics)Schizoaffective disorderPsychiatryPsychopathologyClinical psychologyRating scalePsychosisAffect (linguistics)Developmental psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The observation and debates concerning the coexistence of depression and schizophrenia date back to Kraepelin and Bleuler. Both recognized that among the basic symptoms of 'dementia praecox' and "schizophrenia", are the flattening of affect and the depressed affect and both included in their clinical descriptions of schizophrenia the depressive symptoms. During the recent years this observation has been made official, with the inclusion of diagnoses like schizoaffective psychosis as well as the post psychotic or post schizophrenic depression in the international disease categorization systems DSM and ICD. Several theories have been proposed to explain the relation of depression and schizophrenia, especially when there both appear simultaneously in the same patient. Depression can be present during the prepsychotic prodromal phase, during the acute phase or after the remission of the psychotic features. In addition depressive symptoms could be part of the clinical picture of chronic stabilized patients. Depression in schizophrenia is defined in different ways, i.e. through the criteria of DSM and ICD, through the relevant items of psychopathological scales or through the total rating of depression scales if the score exceeds a certain cut-off. Since the existing depression scales have been created to evaluate depressed patients and therefore there were questions of validity of their use in schizophrenic patients, recently it has been proposed a special scale to evaluate depression specifically in schizophrenic patients (Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia). This scale has been standardized in a Greek sample. In general, according to the existing studies 7-70% of all schizophrenic patients suffer from some form of clinically relevant depression and the median frequency from all the available studies is 25%. The frequency of depression in new schizophrenic patients is 21-24% during the acute phase and it seems that this frequency progressively decreases with the time and stabilizes around 8% in remitted patients. These frequencies may vary upwards depending on the definition of depression. One in four schizophrenic patients with depression presents with suicide ideation and therefore requires appropriate identification and management. As far as predisposing factors for the appearance of depression concerns, the existing data are inadequate and contradictory to extract safe conclusions and therefore further research is in line.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicSchizophrenia research and treatment→French-language works237,207→