MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2395529118 · doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-098-7-774

Logic-based Benders Decomposition for Alternative Resource Scheduling with Sequence Dependent Setups

2012· book-chapter· en· W2395529118 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · 2012
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSequence (biology)Benders' decompositionScheduling (production processes)DecompositionResource (disambiguation)Mathematical optimizationMathematicsChemistryComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study an unrelated parallel machines scheduling problem with sequence and machine dependent setup times. A logic-based Benders decomposition approach is proposed to minimize the makespan. This approach is a hybrid model that makes use of a mixed integer programming master problem and a specialized solver for travelling salesman subproblems. The master problem is used to assign jobs to machines while the subproblems obtain optimal schedules on each machine given the master problem assignments. Computational results show that the Benders model is able to find optimal solutions up to six orders of magnitude faster as well as solving problems six times the size previously possible with a mixed integer programming model in the literature and twice the size that a branchand-bound algorithm can solve for similar problems. We further relax the Benders decomposition to accept suboptimal schedules and demonstrate the ability to parameterize solution quality while out-performing state-of-the-art metaheuristics both in terms of solution quality and mean run-time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it