MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2395647033 · doi:10.1109/waina.2016.160

Cost and Load Reduction Using Heuristic Algorithms in Smart Grid

2016· article· en· W2395647033 on OpenAlexaff
Zafar Iqbal, Nadeem Javaid, Mobushir Riaz Khan, Imran Ahmed, Zahoor Ali Khan, Umar Qasim

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSmart gridParticle swarm optimizationDemand responseGenetic algorithmMathematical optimizationReduction (mathematics)HeuristicsHeuristicEnergy consumptionScheduleElectricityScheduling (production processes)AlgorithmEngineeringArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to smart grid applications the consumers and producers are able to meet the demand of each others and thus take part in demand side management and demand response program. Hence smart grid leads to optimization of energy consumption and reduce high cost in today extensive demand of energy. In this research work we are reducing electricity consumption cost and load consumption using scheduling the appliances. The twenty appliances are used to schedule their energy consumption and load using heuristics techniques i.e. binary particle optimization, genetic algorithm and wind driven optimization, using the same data set for each technique and their results are compared with each other in order to find which technique do better optimization. Simulations are performed in matlab to show the cost and load reduction by the above three techniques and validate the experiment. The simulation results show that binary particle swarm optimization perform better than the other two techniques and wind driven optimization is better than genetic algorithm but not able to perform as binary particle swarm optimization, similarly genetic algorithm is least efficient as compared to both methods. Our research work is beneficial to meet the demand side management and help in reducing electricity cost and load for consumers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.376
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207