MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2395860918 · doi:10.1007/s12603-016-0741-y

A comprehensive fracture prevention strategy in older adults: The European Union Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS) statement

2016· article· en· W2395860918 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hubert Blain, Tahir Masud, Patricia Dargent‐Molina, Finbarr C. Martin, Erik Rosendahl, Nathalie van der Velde, Jean Bousquet, Athanase Bénétos, Cyrus Cooper, John А. Kanis, Jean‐Yves Reginster, René Rizzoli, Bernard Cortet, Mario Barbagallo, Karsten Dreinhöfer, Bruno Vellas, Stefania Maggi, Timo Strandberg

Bibliographic record

VenueThe journal of nutrition health & aging · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCare and Public Health Research Institute, Universiteit MaastrichtMedical Research CouncilNational Institute for Health Research Southampton Biomedical Research CentreCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceUniversité Paris DescartesUniversidad de Las Palmas de Gran CanariaUniversité de LiègeNational Taiwan University HospitalRigshospitaletUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustUniversiteit MaastrichtUniversity of GalwayNational Taiwan UniversityNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchGentofte HospitalCedars-Sinai Medical CenterInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleFaculté de Médecine, Université de GenèveUniversity of OxfordUniversity of SouthamptonNational Center for Global Health and MedicineUniversidad de OviedoMcMaster UniversityNational University of IrelandUniversité Sorbonne Paris CitéGIS-Institut des Maladies RaresCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchClinical Trial Center, China Medical University Hospital
KeywordsGeriatricsMedicineEuropean unionOsteoporosisFall preventionHip fracturePublic healthFoundation (evidence)GerontologyFamily medicineSuicide preventionPoison controlNursingPolitical scienceMedical emergencyPsychiatryBusinessLawPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0210.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations131
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe journal of nutrition health & agingSame topicBone health and osteoporosis researchFrench-language works237,207