MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2395990956

Semantics-aware optimization framework for multi-scale computational methods

2015· article· en· W2395990956 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Muhammad Hasan Jamal

Bibliographic record

VenuePurdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSemantics (computer science)Scale (ratio)Computational semanticsProgramming languageArtificial intelligenceTheoretical computer scienceOperational semantics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An important emerging problem domain in computational science and engineering is the development of multi-scale computational methods for complex problems that span multiple spatial and temporal scales. An attractive approach to solving these problems is recursive decomposition: the problem is broken up into a tree of loosely coupled sub-problems which can be solved independently at different scales and granularity and then coupled back together to obtain the desired solution. Given a mesh decomposition, a particular problem can be solved in myriad ways by coupling the sub-problems together in different tree schedules. As we argue in this thesis, the space of possible schedules is vast, the performance gap between an arbitrary schedule and the best schedules is potentially quite large, and the likelihood that a domain scientist can find the best schedule to solve a problem on a particular machine is vanishingly small. Additionally, a given undecomposed mesh can be decomposed into exponentially large number of decompositions. Effective mesh partitioning is essential for good performance of multi-scale computational methods. The computational cost associated with different scales can vary by multiple orders of magnitude. Hence the problem of finding an optimal partitioning of the mesh, choosing appropriate timescales for the partitions, and determining the number of partitions at each timescale is non-trivial. Existing partitioning tools, such as METIS, overlook the constraints posed by multiscale methods, leading to sub-optimal partitions with a high performance penalty. To handle multi-scale problems appropriately, partitioners and schedulers need to be equipped with domain-specific knowledge that helps generate near optimal partitions and coupling schedules. In this thesis, we present a semantics-aware optimization framework that exploits domain-specific knowledge to produce optimized mesh partitioning automatically, and generate efficient coupling schedules to solve these complex multi-scale computational methods using recursive decomposition. Our Framework adopts the inspector executor paradigm, where the problem is inspected and a novel heuristic finds an effective implementation, i.e. decomposition and its scheduling, based on domain properties evaluated by a cost model. Experimental results show that the derived implementation achieves optimal sequential and parallel performance when executed by a parallel run-time system (Cilk). We demonstrate that our cost model is highly correlated with actual application runtime. Mesh decompositions produced by our approach perform as well as, if not better than, decompositions produced by state-of-the-art partitioners, like METIS, and even those that are manually constructed by domain scientists. The schedule generated by our domain-specific heuristic also outperforms alternate scheduling strategies, as well as over 99% of randomly-generated recursive decompositions sampled from the space of possible solutions. We explore two problem domains under solid mechanics, structural dynamics and peridynamics, and show that by using our framework a good domain-specific cost model is all that is required for a broad range of computational applications in each domain without having to rewrite libraries for each domain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePurdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System)Same topicDistributed and Parallel Computing SystemsFrench-language works237,207