MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2396030159 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2013-432

Using an autoencoder with deformable templates to discover features for automated speech recognition

2013· article· en· W2396030159 on OpenAlexaff
Navdeep Jaitly, Geoffrey E. Hinton

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTIMITSpectrogramAutoencoderHidden Markov modelSpeech recognitionArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Set (abstract data type)Dropout (neural networks)Task (project management)Test setMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we show how we can discover non-linear features of frames of spectrograms using a novel autoencoder. The autoencoder uses a neural network encoder that predicts how a set of prototypes called templates need to be transformed to reconstruct the data, and a decoder that is a function that performs this operation of transforming prototypes and reconstructing the input. We demonstrate this method on spectrograms from the TIMIT database. The features are used in a Deep Neural Network Hidden Markov Model (DNN-HMM) hybrid system for automatic speech recognition. On the TIMIT monophone recognition task we were able to achieve gains of 0.5% over Mel log spectra, by augmenting traditional the spectra with the predicted transformation parameters. Further, using the recently discovered ‘dropout’ training, we were able to achieve a phone error rate (PER) of 17.9% on the dev set and 19.5% on the test set, which, to our knowledge is the best reported number on this task using a hybrid system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.759
Threshold uncertainty score0.740

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207