MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2396058104 · doi:10.1149/ma2015-03/2/553

A Study of Gas Evolution at Elevated Temperature Using Pouch Cells and Pouch Bags

2015· article· en· W2396058104 on OpenAlexaff
Deijun Xiong, Rémi Petibon, J. R. Dahn

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Optimization
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPouchElectrolyteGraphiteChemistryElectrodeAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Lithium (medication)Volume (thermodynamics)Materials scienceChromatographyPhysicsOrganic chemistryThermodynamicsPhysical chemistrySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction A lithium-ion pouch cell cycled at elevated temperature may experience volume expansion due to gas production leading to rapid capacity fade. This gas production may be caused by impurities (LiOH and Li 2 CO 3 ) on the surfaces of electrodes , 1 the instability of LiPF 6 , 2 interactions between the electrolyte and the negative electrode or interactions between the electrolyte and the positive electrode. 3, 4 Recently, Xia et al. found that prop-1-ene-1,3-sultone (PES) suppresses gassing especially for NMC/graphite cells cycled at elevated temperature. 5 Therefore, studies were made using pouch cells and pouch bags to determine the main factor which causes gas production and understand why the addition of PES can suppress gassing at elevated temperature. Experimental The LiNi 1/3 Mn 1/3 Co 1/3 O 2 /graphite [NMC (111)] pouch cells (220 mAh) were filled with 0.9 g of 1M LiPF 6 in EC:EMC (3:7 v/v) (BASF, 99.99%) with 2% PES. After electrolyte filling, they were placed in a temperature box at 40.0°C at 1.5 V for 24 h. After they were charged to 3.8 V at C/20, they were transferred to a glove box for degassing. After degassing, they were charged to either 4.2 or 4.4 V, then discharged to 2.8 V and charged back to the same cutoff voltage until the current dropped to C/2000. Two pouch cells at each cutoff voltage, either 4.2 V or 4.4 V, were moved to a 60°C temperature box for storage. Their voltage and gas volume were measured using a voltmeter and ex-situ gas equipment, respectively. The other cells were transferred to an argon-filled glove box and dissembled there. The delithiated NMC (111) electrodes collected from the full cells were inserted into different pouch bags (made of the same material as pouch cells) with 0.7 g of control electrolyte with 2% PES. In order to study the effect of the LiPF 6 on gas evolution at elevated temperature, some of the delithiated NMC (111) electrodes collected from the full cells were first washed with DMC three times and then inserted into different pouch bags with 0.7 g of EC/EMC with 2% PES. After these pouch bags were vacuum sealed, they were transferred to the same 60 o C temperature box for storage. The volume changes of all pouch bags were measured using the ex-situ gas equipment. Results and discussion Figure 1 shows that the pouch cells and pouch bags containing 2% PES continuously produce gas during storage at 60°C. The rate of gas production for these pouch cells and pouch bags during the 500 h storage period is slower than that for the corresponding pouch cells and pouch bags without 2% PES shown in Figure 1a. This suggests that the addition of PES can slow down electrolyte oxidation at the delithiated NMC (111) electrode maybe due to a better SEI formed at the electrode. However, there is still a large amount of gas generated in the pouch bags even with the addition of PES, which is much larger than that in the corresponding pouch cells. This suggests that the addition of PES does not significantly suppress some gaseous products which can be consumed at the lithiated graphite electrode but suppresses some gaseous products which cannot be consumed at the lithiated graphite electrode. References [1] Y. Kim, J. Solid State Electrochem. , 17 , 1961–1965 (2013). [2] C. L. Campion, W. Li, and B. L. Lucht, J. Electrochem. Soc. , 152 , A2327–A2334 (2005). [3] F. L. Mantia and P. Novák, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. , 11 , A84–A87 (2008). [4]. M. Nie, D. Chalasani, D. P. Abraham, Y. Chen, A. Bose, and B. L. Lucht, J. Phys. Chem. C , 117 , 1257–1267 (2013). [5] J. Xia, L. Ma, C. P. Aiken, K. J. Nelson, L. P. Chen, and J. R. Dahn, J. Electrochem. Soc. , 161 , A1634–A1641 (2014) Figure 1 (a) Gas volume versus time for: pouch cells having an initial voltage of 4.2 V ( black cross) and 4.4 V (black diamond), pouch bags containing the delithiated NMC (111) electrode taken from pouch cells having an initial voltage of 4.2 V (red cross) and 4.4 V (red diamond) and pouch bags containing the delithiated NMC (111) electrode (DMC washing) taken from pouch cells having an initial voltage of 4.2 V (blue cross) and 4.4 V (blue diamond); (b) Open circuit voltage versus time for pouch cells Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.452
Threshold uncertainty score0.605

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicHeat Transfer and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207