MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2396106614

Movement of entomopathogenic nematodes in soils of Fragaria spp.

2004· article· en· W2396106614 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ludger Wennemann, Shanks Ch, Smith Ka

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEntomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoil waterSoil testFragariaLarvaWater contentEnvironmental scienceAgronomyBiologyHorticultureSoil scienceBotanyGeologyGeotechnical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mobility of three entomopathogenic nematodes (Steinernema carpocapsae UK and All Strain, and S. glaseri (Nematoda: Steinernematidae) was observed in strawberry fields in Vancouver, WA. Nematodes were sprinkled over the soil surface using a mason jar. Soil and soil-moisture content, soil composition, soil pH and conductivity was reported over the evaluation period. 12 cm deep soil samples were taken after surface application at 9 and 25 days, 7, 26 and 45 and 6, 22, 37 and 50 days at the three different test sites within the surface application site and at 5 cm distance. Soil samples taken were divided into three layers (0-4, 5-8 and 9-12 cm) and exposed once to five Galleria larvae in the laboratory to evaluate nematode presence and movement. Results after surface application demonstrated more vertical movement of S. glaseri into deeper soil layers in comparison to both S. carpocapsae strains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicEntomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest ControlFrench-language works237,207