MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2396106614

Movement of entomopathogenic nematodes in soils of Fragaria spp.

2004· article· en· W2396106614 on OpenAlex
Ludger Wennemann, Shanks Ch, Smith Ka

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEntomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoil waterSoil testFragariaLarvaWater contentEnvironmental scienceAgronomyBiologyHorticultureSoil scienceBotanyGeologyGeotechnical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mobility of three entomopathogenic nematodes (Steinernema carpocapsae UK and All Strain, and S. glaseri (Nematoda: Steinernematidae) was observed in strawberry fields in Vancouver, WA. Nematodes were sprinkled over the soil surface using a mason jar. Soil and soil-moisture content, soil composition, soil pH and conductivity was reported over the evaluation period. 12 cm deep soil samples were taken after surface application at 9 and 25 days, 7, 26 and 45 and 6, 22, 37 and 50 days at the three different test sites within the surface application site and at 5 cm distance. Soil samples taken were divided into three layers (0-4, 5-8 and 9-12 cm) and exposed once to five Galleria larvae in the laboratory to evaluate nematode presence and movement. Results after surface application demonstrated more vertical movement of S. glaseri into deeper soil layers in comparison to both S. carpocapsae strains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.703
Threshold uncertainty score0.213

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it