MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W239621516 · doi:10.1177/070674370805300110

Book Review: Psychotherapy: Psychoanalytic Diagnostic Manual (PDM)

2008· article· en· W239621516 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Paul Ian Steinberg, Carolyn Steinberg

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychoanalytic theoryPsychotherapistPsychologyPsychoanalysisPsychoanalytic Therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Psychotherapy Psychoanalytic Diagnostic Manual (PDM) PDM Task Force. Silver Spring (MD): The Alliance of Psychoanalytic Organizations; 2006. 857 p. CDN$40.00. Reviewer rating: Excellent The necessary brevity of this review makes it difficult to do justice to this important volume. PDM is a collaborative effort of the American Psychoanalytic Association, International Psychoanalytic Association, Division of Psychoanalysis (39) of American Psychological Association, American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, and National Membership Committee on Psychoanalysis in Clinical Social Work. It attempts to characterize an individual's full range of functioning-the depth as well as the surface of emotional, cognitive and social patterns.p1 This diagnostic framework describes healthy and disordered personality functioning; profiles of mental functioning, including patterns of relating, comprehending, and expressing feelings, coping with stress and anxiety, observing one's own emotions and behaviours, and forming moral judgements; and symptom patterns, including differences in each individual's personal, subjective experience of symptoms. The authors assert that mental health comprises more than simply absence of symptoms'p2 involving one's overall functioning, including relationships; emotional depth, range and regulation; coping capacities; and self-observing capacities: the full range of cognitive, emotional, and behavioural capacities. They note an increasing tendency to define mental problems primarily on the basis of observable symptoms, behaviours, and traits, relegating overall personality functioning and levels of adaptation to a secondary position, and refer to mounting evidence of the complexity of mental functioning. PDM is divided into 3 parts. Part 1, Classification of Adult Mental Disorders, employs 3 dimensions. Personality Patterns and Disorders (P Axis) locates the person on a continuum from healthier to more disordered functioning, and describes the nature of characteristic ways he or she organizes mental functioning and engages the world. An introduction describes different levels of personality functioning. A list of contributing constitutional-maturational factors, central tension-preoccupation, central affects, characteristic pathogenic beliefs about self and others, and central ways of defending follows descriptions of each personality disorder. Personality disorders omitted from DSM-IV-TR are included. Mental Functioning (M Axis) offers a detailed description of emotional functioning, capacities that contribute to one's personality and overall level of health-pathology. Categories include capacity for regulation, attention and learning; capacity for relationships and intimacy; quality of internal experience; capacity for affective experience, expression, and communication; defensive patterns and capabilities; capacity to form internal representations; capacity for differentiation and integration; self-observing capacities; and sense of morality. Mental capacities are defined as optimal or reasonable for age and phase or with phase-specific conflicts or transient developmental challenges, or having mild, moderate, or major constrictions or alterations in mental functioning, or major defects in basic mental functions. Manifest Symptoms and Concerns (S Axis) presents symptom patterns in terms of the patient's personal experience of prevailing difficulties. The authors comment on psychodynamic understanding of each symptom pattern, including treatment implications. Symptom patterns are understood in the context of one's personality structure and mental functioning profile, not disorders in their own right but overt expressions of how patients characteristically cope with experience. Part 1 ends with 3 case descriptions illustrating how to apply the PDM profile. Part 2 concerns classification of child and adolescent mental health disorders. It is divided into 2 sections, one for children and adolescents and the other for infants and very young children. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.033
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.421

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.033
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1260.119

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of PsychiatrySame topicPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207