MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2396236185

Understanding and Implementation of Case Teaching Method

2016· article· en· W2396236185 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lei Yun, Yujie Zhao, Yinke Luo

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation Systems Education and Curriculum Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScope (computer science)Variety (cybernetics)Process (computing)Computer scienceTeaching methodFeature (linguistics)Natural (archaeology)Mathematics educationValue (mathematics)Event (particle physics)PsychologyArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a kind of teaching method, case teaching method has its own practical value and scope of application. In practice, it mainly consists of some links such as “knowledge preparation”, “case arrangement” and “provoking guidance”. Knowledge preparation could be implemented through a variety of forms and the teaching process that is prepared for analysis has its unique feature. Cases can be selected from the aspects of “event level”, “fact capacity” and “understanding degree”. And they would endow natural events with the educational significance. Setting questions teachers could stimulate students’ interest of analysis. And during the process of analysis, it is supposed to lead students use topic concept to analyze these questions around the cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.032
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.051
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.167

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0320.051
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicInformation Systems Education and Curriculum DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207