MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2396337050 · doi:10.3920/978-90-8686-781-3_114

A structural equation model to analyze energy utilization in lactating dairy cows

2013· book-chapter· en· W2396337050 on OpenAlexaff
L.E. Moraes, Anja Varmløse Strathe, E. Kebreab, D. P. Casper, J. Dijkstra, J. France, J.G. Fadel

Bibliographic record

VenueWageningen Academic Publishers eBooks · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnivariateTraitDairy cattleStructural equation modelingMultivariate statisticsStatisticsEnergy balanceEnergy (signal processing)Regression analysisEconometricsAnimal modelAnimal scienceMathematicsBiologyComputer scienceEcologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy balance trials from lactating cows have traditionally been analyzed using the regression approach. However, univariate analysis of mutually interacting animal traits can provide biased parameter estimates if one trait is used as an explanatory variable to model a second trait and the sub-model of the first trait is ignored (Gianola and Sorensen, 2004). Moreover, multivariate methods should be preferred because animal responses are correlated and relationships among responses can be quantified through the use of structural equations. Furthermore, the US current energy evaluation system of dairy cattle (NRC, 2001) relies on energetic parameters from the 1960’s but over the past decades genetic improvement of dairy cattle has substantially increased the ability of cows to produce milk. The objective of the present study was to analyze energy utilization in lactating cows using structural equations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.409
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWageningen Academic Publishers eBooksSame topicAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactFrench-language works237,207