MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2396383033

A ROBUST BORDER DETECTION ALGORITHM WITH APPLICATION TO MEDIEVAL MUSIC MANUSCRIPTS

2009· article· en· W2396383033 on OpenAlexafffund
Ouyang Yue, John Burgoyne, Laurent Pugin, Ichiro Fujinaga

Bibliographic record

VenueBern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHandwritten Text Recognition Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceMusicalNatural (archaeology)Process (computing)Simple (philosophy)Artificial intelligenceImage (mathematics)AlgorithmComputer visionArtProgramming languageVisual artsArchaeologyHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Medieval music manuscripts pose special challenges for digital processing.Their unique page layouts and sometimes extreme degradation can make it difcult even to identify the portions of an image that correspond to the musical page.This paper addresses the page identication problem for medieval documents, with natural extensions to any type of image processing that entails separating a border from the central image content.Aimed at keeping the removal process simple and fast, we present a contour-searching approach that is novel for using only the paper itself, without cues from staff lines or other musical elements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern)Same topicHandwritten Text Recognition TechniquesFrench-language works237,207