MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2396513896 · doi:10.82308/14027

Psychological stress and vulnerability for Major Depressive Disorder: cortisol, brain structure, function, and cognitive processing in young adults

2011· article· en· W2396513896 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katarina Dedovic

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicStress Responses and Cortisol
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyStressorSocial stressCognitionVulnerability (computing)Clinical psychologyDevelopmental psychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Psychological stress has an important impact on one's physical and mental health. Activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) stress axis and the subsequent increase in the stress hormone cortisol constitutes the organism's main response to stress. Individual differences in stress response contribute to one's vulnerability and resilience to a host of physical and psychological ills. Understanding the regulatory networks underlying stress processing in both healthy and vulnerable populations is essential. The work presented in this thesis aimed to investigate neural correlates of psychological stress processing and the HPA axis function in samples of healthy individuals as well as those with distinct vulnerability to a stress-related illness, Major Depressive Disorder. Our literature review revealed that only studies using serial subtraction or the Montreal Imaging Stress Task (MIST), a task that combines mental arithmetic and negative social evaluation components, were able to induce a significant cortisol stress response. Deactivation in orbitofrontal regions and the limbic system were most consistently observed in response to psychological stress. Exposing healthy subjects to a new, event-related version of MIST revealed that reduction of brain activity in the limbic system observed previously was specifically associated with the processing of social evaluative threat, a key component of psychological stress. We then examined HPA axis function (both basal and reactive) and the HPA regulatory brain areas for evidence of dysregulation in a sample of healthy young adults who showed varying levels of depressive tendencies, but at subclinical levels. This was the first time that these concepts were assessed in a subclinically depressed population. The subjects with increased subclinical levels of depression showed impairments in HPA function (in a form of blunted cortisol awakening response and blunted stress response), as well as impairment in certain key regions within the HPA axis regulatory network (for e.g. small hippocampal volumes and dysregulated medial orbitofrontal cortex). I conclude the thesis by proposing a basic model of a neural network underlying stress processing in a healthy population, and also outline nodes at which this network might be affected in subclinically depressed populations. Some research avenues for future studies are also highlighted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicStress Responses and Cortisol→French-language works237,207→