MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2396889329 · doi:10.2118/180728-ms

An Improved Reaction Kinetics Model Of In-Situ Combustion For Pre-Steamed Oil Sands

2016· article· en· W2396889329 on OpenAlexafffund
Min Yang, Zhangxin Chen, Thomas G. Harding

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCMG Reservoir Simulation FoundationUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsSteam injectionOil sandsCokeCombustionSecondary air injectionCrackingAsphaltenePetroleum engineeringSteam-assisted gravity drainageEnvironmental scienceChemistryThermal efficiencyProcess engineeringChemical engineeringWaste managementMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryEngineeringAsphalt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) is a proven commercial thermal technology for oil sands recovery, but it has some limitations including low energy efficiency during generation and transport of steam to the producing formation and high capital and operating costs making SAGD projects vulnerable to low oil prices. In-situ combustion (ISC) provides an alternative to steam injection with the advantages of lower costs and higher energy efficiency. In recent years, ISC has been evaluated as a follow-up process to SAGD with the expectation to combine the advantages of steam injection and in-situ combustion. Before the design of such a hybrid process, it is important to understand the chemical reactions between air (or oxygen) and residual oil within a SAGD chamber in the presence of water and steam in order to simulate the process with a reasonable degree of confidence. In this study, an improved reaction kinetics model, in terms of Saturates, Aromatics, Resins, and Asphaltenes (SARA) fractions, is proposed for modelling the ISC process in pre-steamed Athabasca oil sands. From the results of a set of laboratory Ramped Temperature Oxidation (RTO) tests, including temperature profiles along a reactor and produced gas composition, the oxidation behavior at different temperatures has been carefully analyzed. Based on the analysis, a reaction kinetics model consisting of Low Temperature Oxidation (LTO), thermal cracking, and High Temperature Oxidation (HTO), has been developed. This model was then incorporated into CMG STARS to simulate RTO experiments. From the simulation study, it was found that the coke, which is formed through cracking reactions and traditionally considered to be the main source of fuel in ISC, reacts slowly at high temperatures in the RTO tests. The other source of fuel for combustion in the RTO tests is light hydrocarbons distilled or cracked from the original bitumen. These findings have been incorporated into the proposed reaction model. The experimental results of seven RTO tests, including temperature profiles, oxygen consumption, and carbon oxides production, were successfully matched by tuning kinetic parameters. This work greatly increases understanding of fuel sources in an ISC process. The newly improved reaction kinetics model can predict oxidation and combustion behavior of ISC for pre-steamed Athabasca oil sands under a wide range of temperatures. It also provides a solid foundation for future simulation studies and technical guidance for the design of hybrid steam-combustion processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical ConferenceSame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207