MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2396892013 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/nov209.22

CBIO-22DICER AND miRNAs REGULATE GLIOMA STEM CELL CHARACTERISTICS

2015· article· en· W2396892013 on OpenAlexaff
Sheila Mansouri, Sanjay Kumar Singh, Kelly Burrell, Mira Li, Amir Alamsahebpour, Kenneth Aldape, Gelareh Zadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDicerBiologymicroRNAGene knockdownCancer researchSOX2Stem cellGliomaGene silencingStem cell markerDroshaCell growthOncomirBMI1Cancer stem cellSmall hairpin RNARNA interferenceCell cultureCell biologyGeneticsRNATranscription factorGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deregulation of microRNA expression is common in a variety of malignancies, including glioma. Several studies have demonstrated the role of miRNAs in regulating glioma stem cell (GSC) properties. In addition, DICER, which regulates the processing of precursor miRNAs to the mature double-stranded form, is down-regulated in multiple forms of cancer. To determine the role of DICER and miRNA regulation in the development and progression of glioblastoma, we investigated the link between miRNA deregulation and GSC characteristics. Our in vitro studies using GSC 7-2 and U251 glioma cell line demonstrated that decreased DICER expression by shRNA treatment results in a global decrease in expression of miRNAs, the majority of which are tumor suppressor miRNAs such as the let-7 family of miRNAs. DICER knockdown increased proliferation of GSCs, while their “stemness” properties, such as their ability to form neurospheres and the levels of stem cell markers such as Sox2 and Bmi1, decreased upon shDicer treatment. Intracranial injection of GSC 7-2 and U251 cells treated with shDicer resulted in decreased overall survival in xenografted mice. Further analysis of the tumors isolated from these mice demonstrated that DICER knockdown results in a relative increase in tumor cell proliferation, as shown by increased ki-67 labeling (30% Ki67 positive nuclei in shDicer versus 15% in shControl tumors), a decrease in expression of Sox2 (stemness marker; 13% in shDicer versus 31% in shControl tumors), and increase in expression of GFAP (astrocytic differentiation marker). Analysis of data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database suggests that high Dicer expression level is correlated with better prognosis of GBM patients and this supports our in vivo data. Our results highlight the role of DICER and miRNAs as potential regulators of GSC proliferation, stem- versus progenitor-like state, and their potential link to development or progression of glioma tumors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicMicroRNA in disease regulation→French-language works237,207→