MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2396909202 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.5b11599

Shaped Post-Field Electronic Oscillations in H<sub>2</sub><sup>+</sup> Excited by Two-Cycle Laser Pulses: Three-Dimensional Non-Born–Oppenheimer Simulations

2016· article· en· W2396909202 on OpenAlexafffund
G. K. Paramonov, Oliver Kühn, André D. Bandrauk

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersCanada Research ChairsDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftAlexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
KeywordsBorn–Oppenheimer approximationExcited stateAtomic physicsField (mathematics)LaserPhysicsExcited electronic stateOpticsQuantum mechanicsMathematicsMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quantum dynamics of H 2 + excited by two-cycle laser pulses with laser carrier frequencies corresponding to the wavelengths λ l = 800 and 200 nm (corresponding to the periods τ l = 2.667 and 0.667 fs, respectively) and being linearly polarized along the molecular axis have been studied by the numerical solution of the non-Born–Oppenheimer time-dependent Schrödinger equation within a three-dimensional (3D) model, including the internuclear distance R and electron coordinates z and ρ. The amplitudes of the pulses have been chosen such that the energies of H 2 + after the ends of the laser pulses, ⟨ E ⟩ ≈ −0.515 au, were close to the dissociation threshold of H 2 + . It is found that there exists a certain characteristic oscillation frequency ω osc = 0.2278 au (corresponding to the period τ osc = 0.667 fs and the wavelength λ osc = 200 nm) that plays the role of a “carrier” frequency of temporally shaped oscillations of the expectation values ⟨−∂ V /∂ z ⟩ emerging after the ends of the laser pulses, both at λ l = 800 nm and at λ l = 200 nm. Moreover, at λ l = 200 nm, the expectation value ⟨ z ⟩ also demonstrates temporally shaped oscillations after the end of the laser pulse. In contrast, at λ l = 800 nm, the characteristic oscillation frequency ω osc = 0.2278 au appears as the frequency of small-amplitude oscillations of the slowly varying expectation value ⟨ z ⟩ which makes, after the end of the pulse, an excursion with an amplitude of about 4.5 au along the z axis and returns back to ⟨ z ⟩ ≈ 0 afterward. It is found that the period of the temporally shaped post-field oscillations of ⟨−∂ V /∂ z ⟩ and ⟨ z ⟩, estimated as τ shp ≈ 30 fs, correlates with the nuclear motion. It is also shown that vibrational excitation of H 2 + is accompanied by the formation of “hot” and “cold” vibrational ensembles along the R degree of freedom. Power spectra related to the electron motion in H 2 + calculated for both the laser-driven z and optically passive ρ degrees of freedom in the acceleration form proved to be very interesting. In particular, both odd and even harmonics can be observed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207